General Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 152
Smith v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00062
Petitioner: Derrick A. Smith, Jr.
Respondent: Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Derrick McRae v. Eddie Buffaloe
as 24-6350
Petitioner: DERRICK JOVAN MCRAE
Respondent: EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., Secretary, N.C. Department of Public Safety
Smith, Jr. v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner: Derrick Smith, Jr.
Respondent: Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Letterlough v. North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02072
Petitioner: Derrick Derrail Letterlough
Respondent: North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LETTERLOUGH v. NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00284
Petitioner: DERRICK DERRAIL LETTERLOUGH
Respondent: NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fishburne v. Lavern Cohen
as 0:2024cv01210
Petitioner: Derrick Fishburne
Respondent: Lavern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bain v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00042
Petitioner: Tamien Derrick Bain
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Jansen
as 2:2023cv06977
Petitioner: Derrick A. Jones
Respondent: Warden Sean Jansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harris v. Leu
as 2:2023cv00526
Petitioner: Derrick Lamont Harris
Respondent: David Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pharr v. Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00483
Petitioner: Derrick Antonio Pharr
Respondent: Harold Clarke and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?