Cases 1 - 10 of 36,658
Ortiz-Carrasquillo v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00368
Petitioner:
Giovanni Janick Ortiz-Carrasquillo and Giovanni Janick Ortiz
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santos v. Holloway et al
as 6:2024cv03328
Petitioner:
Eliseo Santos
Respondent:
Ryan Holloway and Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
SEWELL v. BOP
as 1:2024cv00472
Petitioner:
DAVID ERIC SEWELL
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ong v. Scruggs
as 1:2024cv01662
Petitioner:
Lye H. Ong
Respondent:
Carolyn J. Scruggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santos v. Holloway et al
as 5:2024cv03328
Petitioner:
Eliseo Santos
Respondent:
Ryan Holloway and Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Abdussalaam v. The State of Virginia et al
as 3:2024cv00410
Petitioner:
Munir-Ibn Sami Abdussalaam
Respondent:
The State of Virginia, Amherst County Adult Detention Center and Appomattox Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lott v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Darion D Lott
Respondent:
Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fields v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jay James Fields
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
White v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00364
Petitioner:
Michael Maurice White
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Craig W. Stallard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Bailey
as 2:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Warden Mack Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
