Cases 31 - 40 of 116
Harris v. City of Richmond Office of the Sheriff
as 1:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Meldrick D Harris
Defendant:
City of Richmond Office of the Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Dawud Islam v. Colette McEachin
as 22-6185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAWUD YAMINI ISLAM
Defendant / Appellee:
COLETTE MCEACHIN, Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Richmond, Virginia
Intervenor:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Reaves v. Dickens et al
as 4:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Charles M. Dickens, South Carolina Highway Patrol, South Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
LILES v. RICHMOND COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2021cv00957
Plaintiff:
JAMES DAVID LILES, JR.
Defendant:
RICHMOND COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe v. Herring et al
as 3:2021cv00193
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Mark Herring, Karl Leonard and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Madison Love and Mark Madison Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Richmond Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wayne Lewis
Defendant:
Officer Urban, Richmond Police Department, Officer Levy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henley v. Richmond Justice Center
as 1:2021cv00218
Defendant:
Richmond Justice Center
Plaintiff:
Vernon L. Henley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantrell v. Strong et al
as 3:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Reggie Sellers, Jeremy Killgore, Spencer Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Wayne Cantrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Folks v. Ellison
as 1:2021cv00105
Defendant:
Richard Roundtree, Richmond County, Aiken County E.M.S. and others
Plaintiff:
Jerrald Anthony Folks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Reed v. Higgins et al
as 1:2020cv01336
Defendant:
Sgt Spinos, Detective Provost, Detective Bourne and others
Plaintiff:
Troy L Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
