Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Rankins v. Windsor Police Department
as 5:2024ct03029
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Windsor Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarun Vyas v. Chad Morris
as 23-6625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TARUN KUMAR VYAS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD MORRIS, Special Agent, V.S.P., ALYCIA ELDRIDGE, Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney, HEAD OF THE INTERNAL CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN (I.C.A.C) DIVISION OF VSP and others
Vyas v. Morris et al
as 7:2023cv00216
Defendant:
Kelly Warner, Chad Morris, Alycia Eldridge and others
Plaintiff:
Tarun Kumar Vyas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquez v. Cooper et al
as 6:2022cv04592
Plaintiff:
Emily Marquez
Defendant:
Jonathon Cooper, Brayden Leopold, Justice Rallis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Rankins v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03259
Plaintiff:
Johnte Rankins
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Eddie Buffaloe Jr., State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RANKIN v. STOKES et al
as 1:2021cv00613
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J.L. RANKIN
Defendant:
JERRY STOKES, DAVID WHISENANT, SALISBURY POST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin v. City of Florence et al
as 4:2021cv01711
Defendant:
Florence Sheriff, Magistrate Courts, City of Florence and others
Plaintiff:
William Dwayne Rankin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Lexington County Court of General Sessions et al
as 3:2019cv01898
Defendant:
Casey Rankin-Smith and Lexington County Court of General Sessions
Plaintiff:
Hayward L Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Rankin et al
as 3:2018cv02905
Defendant:
Casey N Rankin, State of South Carolina and Alan M Wilson
Plaintiff:
Hayward L Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankins v. City of Edenton et al
as 5:2018ct03151
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
City of Edenton, Jay Fortenbury and Laura M. Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
