Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Shade v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
John William Shade, III
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice, Jason Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren Giddings v. Nurse Green
as 23-6153
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN MATTHEW GIDDINGS and WARREN MATTHEW GIDDINGS, a/k/a Warren Mathew Giddings
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE GREEN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WILLS and WILLIAM BOHRER, Warden
Davis v. Stennett et al
as 5:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Wille Davis
Defendant:
Erin Stennett, Hall, Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Contee v. Foust et al
as 1:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
Robert Contee
Defendant:
Sgt. Wright, CO II Blain, CO II Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Giddings v. Green et al
as 1:2021cv02850
Plaintiff:
Warren Matthew Giddings
Defendant:
Nurse Green and CO Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Watkins v. Lyons et al
as 1:2021cv02466
Plaintiff:
Nafiz Shaun Watkins
Defendant:
Keith Lyons, Michael Resnick, Dayona Corcoran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Williams v. Eagleton
as 0:2016cv03187
Plaintiff:
Elliott Williams
Defendant:
Wille L Eagleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy Shannon, Jr. v. Department of Public Safety
as 15-6500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUY G. SHANNON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, WARDEN J. PHILIP MORGAN and others
:
Michael Kanode, Sr. v. Derek Swope
as 12-8005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. KANODE, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DEREK C. SWOPE, Judge, SCOTT ASH, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, MIKE L. GILLS, Detective and others
James Taylor v. David Robinson
as 12-7671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES IRVIN TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID A. ROBINSON, Chief of Operations, JIM PARKS, Central Classification, ANITA BRYANT, Regional Ombudsman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
