Cases 31 - 40 of 19,822
Neal v. Carter et al
as 5:2024ct03138
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neal and Christopher Lee Neal
Defendant:
RN Teresa Carter, P.A. Erica Kearney, Nurse Cora Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Hensel et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Joshua C. McKinney
Defendant:
James Hensel, III, Dr. James Beane, Carla Deem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Little, Jr. v. John Palmer
as 24-6516
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTONIO LITTLE, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN PALMER, Warden, BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director, T. ROBERTSON, Assistant Warden and others
Graves v. White et al
as 1:2024cv03233
Plaintiff:
Michael David Graves, Jr.
Defendant:
Cathy White, Shanna Peeler, Officer Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, Mickduff and Mark Andersham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker Washington, Jr. v. Warden Kelly
as 24-6514
Plaintiff:
WALKER WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN KELLY, Individual Capacity, CAPTAIN CHASE, Individual Capacity, LIEUTENANT ALLEN, (S.E.S.) (S.I.S.), Individual Capacity and others
Whitehurst v. Lewis et al
as 5:2024ct03136
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ronnell Whitehurst
Defendant:
Timothy L. Lewis, Mashell L. Wilson and Sgt. D. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pate
as 5:2024ct03137
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Lovett
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Damarcus Da'shaun Dixon
Defendant:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
James v. United States of America
as 5:2024ct03134
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
