Cases 1 - 10 of 26
ELLIS v. LEONARD et al
as 1:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JERMAINE ELLIS
Defendant:
C. LEONARD, RONNIE BEST, JAMES FURLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Best, Jr. v. Sgt. Sommers
as 24-6073
Plaintiff:
PAUL R. BEST, JR., a/k/a Paul Rawling Best, Jr.
Defendant:
MAJOR LEGGINGS, SGT. SOMMERS, CO MITCHELL and others
Bullard v. Lebray et al
as 5:2023ct03351
Plaintiff:
William Domonic Bullard
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Lebray, Correctional Officer Dixon and Correctional Officer Best
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Best v. ASGDC- employees et al
as 1:2023cv05539
Plaintiff:
Paul R. Best, Jr. and Paul Rawling Best, Jr.
Defendant:
ASGDC- employees, Sgt. Sommers, c/o Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Christopher Frione v. Sergeant Best
as 23-7021
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SHAWN FRIONE
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT BEST, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HOWELL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CARMON and others
Best v. Ezzell et al
as 5:2022ct03122
Plaintiff:
Tellys Best
Defendant:
Sgt. Ezzell, Lt. Roberts and Sgt. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frione v. Best et al
as 5:2021ct03125
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Howell, Correctional Officer Edwards, Sergeant Best and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shawn Frione
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Best v. Adams
as 3:2020cv00148
Respondent:
Warden Adams
Petitioner:
Michelle Renee Best
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Corbett v. Hooks et al
as 5:2019ct03361
Defendant:
Officer Holmes, Mr. Ballard, Sgt. Brounson and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillingham v. Clarke et al
as 2:2015cv00125
Plaintiff:
James H. Dillingham, III
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Wendall Pixley, Mr. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
