Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Binns v. Coles et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Gregory Binns
Defendant:
SGT. Coles, LT. Riggsby, K9 Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Artis et al
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
David M. Whitfield
Defendant:
Sgt Artis, Ches. Jail Medical Staff, Sgt Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowery v. Davis et al
as 2:2023cv02517
Plaintiff:
Byrlene Lowery
Defendant:
Schanen Davis, Juana Washington and MHO Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03416
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Harris
Defendant:
FNU Cooper, FNU Gardner, FNU Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PERRY v. GILL et al
as 1:2022cv00872
Plaintiff:
MONTREAL PERRY
Defendant:
J. GILL and PERSON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitefield v. Medical Staff et al
as 2:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Whitefield and David Maurice Whitfield
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Sgt. Artis, Sgt. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterling Singleton v. Bryan Stirling
as 22-6571
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STERLING L. SINGLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director of SCDC, DENNIS PATTERSON, Director of Operations, WILLIE DAVIS, Regional Director and others
Singleton v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Sterling L Singleton
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P. Stirling, Dennis Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Singleton v. SCDC et al
as 9:2021cv03820
Plaintiff:
Sterling L. Singleton
Defendant:
SCDC, Bryan P. Stirling, Dennis Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strickland v. Gill et al
as 4:2015cv02304
Plaintiff:
James S Strickland
Defendant:
Nurse Gill, K Moore and Dr Palimam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
