Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Charles Cook v. Surry County Sheriff's Office
as 24-6194
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DAVID COOK
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, OFFICER GOINS, Sheriff, OFFICER ETHAN EVANS, Sheriff and others
COOK v. SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DAVID COOK
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, OFFICER GOINS and ETHAN EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOK v. SURY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2023cv01109
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DAVID COOK
Defendant:
SURY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE, OFFICER GOINS, OFFICER ETHAN EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goins v. Jenkins
as 5:2023cv04933
Plaintiff:
Sean Goins
Defendant:
Sergeant Jenkins and Lexington County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Goins v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2023ct03100
Plaintiff:
Brandon S. Goins
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wendt et al v. Bullard et al
as 5:2023ct03047
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Samuel Clement Wendt, Brandon S. Goins and others
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Mark Barnhill, NC Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nesbitt v. Cumpagna et al
as 0:2020cv04193
Defendant:
Mr. M. Chartier, Sergeant Francis, Capt. Pendergrass and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Solomon et al
as 5:2019ct03308
Defendant:
Officer Roppers, Officer Goin, Officer Tryman and others
Plaintiff:
Offie Curtis Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massey v. Goins et al
as 5:2019cv00030
Defendant:
FNU Johnson and FNU Goins
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Lee Massey
Massey v. Goins et al
as 5:2019ct03067
Defendant:
Officer Johnson and Sgt. Goins
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Lee Massey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
