Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Wolff v. Rose
as 5:2024ct03108
Plaintiff:
Travis J. Wolff
Defendant:
Dallas Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moumouni v. Chester County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Rose Moumouni and Rose B. Moumouni
Defendant:
Chester County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Griffin v. Stonebreaker et al
as 1:2024cv01541
Plaintiff:
Gary Jason Griffin
Defendant:
Warden Donnie Stonebreaker, Jr, Associate Warden Gause, Associate Warden Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Rose v. Darden et al
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Derek Kent Rose
Defendant:
Tony Darden, Cris Desmond, Angela Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Patterson v. David Spence
as 24-6205
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. PATTERSON
Defendant:
DAVID SPENCE, JUDGE HARRELL, DALLAS ROSE and others
Ward v. Rose et al
as 1:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ward
Defendant:
Director Rose, J Reuben Long Medical Staff and Medical of J. Reuben Long Detention
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Al-Haqq v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Ms. June Smith, Nurse Harrigan, Nurse Bonnie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Squires v. McKee et al
as 5:2023ct03266
Plaintiff:
Illya Devon Squires
Defendant:
Detective Brad McKee, Officer G. Rose, Officer J. Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Spence et al
as 5:2023ct03250
Plaintiff:
David A. Patterson
Defendant:
David Spence, Judge Harrell, Dallas Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Palmer et al
as 5:2023cv01415
Plaintiff:
Terrell Nelson
Defendant:
Warden John Palmer, A/W Yolanda Turner, A/W Thomas Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
