Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Mook v. City of Martinsville, Virginia et al
as 4:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Mook
Defendant:
City of Martinsville, Virginia and G. Andrew Hall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Dutton et al v. REM West Virginia, LLC
as 1:2021cv00147
Plaintiff:
Roberta K. Dutton and Joshua P. Dutton
Defendant:
REM West Virginia, LLC and REM Community Options, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clemons v. Walter P. Rawl & Sons, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00285
Defendant:
Walter P. Rawl & Sons, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michelle Clemons
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Monica Quintana v. City of Alexandria
as 16-1630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONICA P. QUINTANA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA
Defendant:
RANDSTAD US LP, LISA BAKER and KOURTNEY HARRIS
Quintana v. City of Alexandria et al
as 1:2015cv01553
Plaintiff:
Monica P. Quintana
Defendant:
City of Alexandria , Randstad US, L.P. , Lisa Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Williams v. P-B Health Home Care Agency, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02329
Plaintiff:
Artisha G Williams
Defendant:
P-B Health Home Care Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Brooks v. IQOR Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00643
Plaintiff:
Vanessa P Brooks
Defendant:
IQOR Inc and IQOR US Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Gerstner v. Walter P Rawl and Sons Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02973
Plaintiff:
Farie Gerstner
Defendant:
Walter P Rawl and Sons Inc , Tim Rabon and Jeff Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cruthirds v. Lacey et al
as 5:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
Shelia Y. Cruthirds
Defendant:
Raymond P. Lacey, Brandi Swart, Kathy J. Shearer and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MILES v. LANKFORD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2013cv01077
Defendant:
LANKFORD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MILES
Mediator:
KENNETH P. CARLSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
