Cases 31 - 40 of 1,396
Jaimes v. Cen-Med Enterprises, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00882
Plaintiff:
Jack Jaimes
Defendant:
Cen-Med Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Clarkson v. Food Lion LLC
as 8:2023cv06588
Plaintiff:
Kara Clarkson
Defendant:
Food Lion LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Perry v. Utiliquest, LLC
as 1:2023cv03369
Plaintiff:
Tavaughn Perry
Defendant:
Utiliquest, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Workman v. Scenic Enterprise, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Josh Workman
Defendant:
Scenic Enterprise, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniform Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA)
Abdul et al v. Comissioner of Labor & Ind. et al
as 1:2023cv03291
Plaintiff:
Shanna K. Abdul, Kenneth William Bryant, Catapulting Change Renovations LLC and others
Defendant:
Comissioner of Labor & Ind., Joel Funez Aquino and Isis Diaz Mejia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
McKinley Wright, Jr. v. South Carolina Department of Employment
as 23-2220
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MCKINLEY WRIGHT, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND WORKFORCE, SEFA TRANSPORTATION INC., SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Burns v. Scott
as 8:2023cv03077
Plaintiff:
Robert Burns
Defendant:
Gabriel Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Workman v. LHC Group, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
James Edward Workman
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Green v. United Insurance Company of America
as 6:2023cv05706
Plaintiff:
Sean Green
Defendant:
United Insurance Company of America doing business as Kemper Life
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
