Cases 11 - 20 of 173
Hutson v. Harper et al
as 2:2023cv03543
Plaintiff:
M.B. Hutson
Defendant:
Thomas L. Harper, Esq., R. Wayne Byrd Estate, John Wilkerson, Esq. and others
Jay Folse v. Tiffany Hoffman
as 23-1709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAY FOLSE
Defendant / Appellee:
TIFFANY HOFFMAN, in her personal capacity, CHRISTIPHER COOK, in his personal capacity, JONATHAN STIPETICH, in his personal capacity and others
Folse v. Hoffman et al
as 5:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Jay Folse
Defendant:
Tiffany Hoffman, Christipher Cook, Jonathan Stipetich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
The Estate of Travis Terrell Morris v. Hughes et al
as 4:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Travis Terrell Morris
Defendant:
Sheriff Fred Hughes, III, Sergeant Terrence Damon Harkley, Corporal Thomas Michael Bersch, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv04198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
