Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2041
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv04836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Curtis v. South Carolina Department of Public Safety et al
as 3:2015cv03753
Plaintiff:
Biafra Monique Curtis
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Public Safety , Warren Ganjehsani , Mike Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Calvert County et al
as 8:2015cv00920
Plaintiff:
Wayne E. Coleman
Defendant:
Calvert County, Calvert County Sheriff Department , Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHELPS v. TOURTELLOT et al
as 1:2014cv00844
Plaintiff:
CALVIN A PHELPS
Defendant:
PETER TOURTELLOT, JOHN NORTHEN, MICHAEL MEBANE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Mable v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City et al
as 1:2013cv00650
Plaintiff:
Ezra Mable
Defendant:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, Baltimore City Police Department, Ed Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. North et al
as 3:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
Michelle N. Evans
Defendant:
Patrolman North, Cpl. Albaugh, Patrolman Gibbons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gregory v. Phelps et al
as 3:2012cv00121
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Gregory
Defendant:
Craig Phelps, Shanna Spiker and Their one unknown Police Officer JOHN DOE #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
