Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Tandy Carter
as 17-1672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
TANDY CARTER, individually for damages for qui tam recovery, BARBARA JEAN BURNS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01008
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Ayele v. My Montgomery County Media et al
as 8:2017cv00354
Plaintiff:
Michael Ayele
Defendant:
My Montgomery County Media, Montgomery County Police Department, Sonia Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Eggleston v. Burke et al
as 5:2016cv04451
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Eggleston
Defendant:
Austin G. Burke, Paul O'Dell, Joe Delong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe et al v. Piehota et al
as 1:2016cv00373
Plaintiff:
Baby Doe , Yaseen Kadura , Anas Elhady and others
Defendant:
Christopher M. Piehota, Robin C. Burke, Timothy J. Healy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
