Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Pamela Melvin v. Tracy Naylor
as 15-1782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAMELA MELVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
TRACY NAYLOR and GUARDIAN HART MEDICAL CARE
Fogel v. Harrison et al
as 5:2015cv00147
Plaintiff:
Mark H. Fogel
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison, Michael Ramirez, Joshua Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melvin v. Naylor et al
as 5:2014cv00486
Plaintiff:
Pamela Melvin
Defendant:
Tracy Naylor and Guardian Hart Medical Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Estate of Doris Holt v. Horry County, South Carolina
as 14-1678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DORIS HOLT, Estate of, RODNEY KEITH LAIL and IRENE SANTACROCE
Plaintiff:
JAMES SPENCER, SOUTHERN HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, RICKY STEPHENS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HORRY COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, HORRY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES ALBERT ALLEN, JR. and others
James Spencer v. Horry County, South Carolina
as 14-1666
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES SPENCER
Plaintiff:
RODNEY KEITH LAIL, IRENE SANTACROCE, SOUTHERN HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL STEVEN HARTNESS, HAROLD STEVEN HARTNESS, ANCIL B. GARVIN, III and others
:
, and
Sadler v. Hart et al
as 6:2013cv29542
Plaintiff:
John Sadler
Defendant:
Jay Hart, Michael Bosley, Joe Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
