Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Hodges et al v. Rufus et al
as 3:2017cv00859
Plaintiff:
Yaisha Hodges and Minor, T.M
Defendant:
Freddie Rufus, Jacqulyn Maddon, Aaron McCurdy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1738
Denison v. Matal
as 1:2017cv01390
Plaintiff:
Joanne M. Denison
Defendant:
Joseph D. Matal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Moyihan et al
as 3:2017cv00685
Plaintiff:
JoAnn James
Defendant:
Brian Moyihan, Ronald Tankamnerd and Max O. Cogburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Richard Fletcher v. Maryland Transit Admin
as 17-1830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD FLETCHER and JOANN FLETCHER
Defendant - Appellee:
MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, MTA, MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PETE K. RAHN, Maryland Transportation Secretary, individually and in his official capacity and others
Defendant:
KEENAN T. HOLLOWAY, SAMTOYA I. WILLIAMS, ANTOINE W. LAWSON and others
James v. Tankamnerd et al
as 3:2017cv00418
Plaintiff:
JoAnn James
Defendant:
Ronald Tankamnerd, Brian Moyihan and Max O. Cogburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Darrell Trigg v. Mary Katherine Jone
as 17-1801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD DARRELL TRIGG
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY KATHERINE JONES, ERNEST HAROLD JONES, JERI MORRILL and others
James v. Tankamnerd
as 3:2017cv00334
Plaintiff:
JoAnn James
Defendant:
Ronald Tankamnerd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Meigs v. Ellinghaus-Jones et al
as 1:2017cv01360
Plaintiff:
Douglas Meigs
Defendant:
Joanne Ellinghaus-Jones and State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shinaberry v. Town of Murfreesboro, N.C. et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE 2:17-CV-7-F.
as 4:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Shinaberry
Defendant:
Town of Murfreesboro, N.C., Bobbie J Barmer, Michael P Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
