Cases 41 - 50 of 53
McDowell v. Town of Sophia et al
as 5:2012cv01340
Plaintiff:
Damon McDowell
Defendant:
Town of Sophia , Town Council of Sophia , Sophia Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Randy Thomas v. Ronald Chapman
as 12-1269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD L. CHAPMAN, In his Official and Personal Capacity, CHRISTY T. MANN, Judge, In her Official and Personal Capacity, GEORGE E. BATTLE, III, In his Official and Personal Capacity and others
McDowell v. Mack
as 1:2011cv02380
Plaintiff:
Edward McDowell
Defendant:
Patricia Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carr v. Doe et al
as 1:2011cv00019
Plaintiff:
James Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Jane Doe , Stevens Correctional Facility , The McDowell County Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv01685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Alfred Thomas v. Christy Mann
as 09-1342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED T. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTY T. MANN, Judge, MECKLENBURG COUNTY GENERAL DISTRICT & CIRCUIT COURTS, MCDOWELL STREET CENTER FOR FAMILY LAW, INCORPORATED and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.