Cases 51 - 60 of 255
Charles Gatebe v. Bill Nelson
as 22-2127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES K. GATEBE
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL NELSON, NASA Administrator
Defendant:
UNIVERSITIES SPACE RESEARCH ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hutton v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 3:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hugh Hutton
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Cynthia Ferrell, Bill Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
FUNKHOUSER v. ARBORGAST et al
as 5:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
BRANDI FUNKHOUSER
Defendant:
CAYLYN ARBORGAST, CAROLINE S. BILL, KAITLYN BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alford v. Nelson et al
as 7:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Alford
Defendant:
Bill Nelson, Jim Brienstein, Christine Paulsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm Fed. Question: Family and Medical Leave Act
Davina Ricketts v. Wake County Public School System
as 22-1814
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVINA RICKETTS
Defendant / Appellee:
WAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM, WCPSS, WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, KEITH SUTTON, current Board Member and others
Doe v. Crouch et al
as 2:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Bill Crouch, Ayne Amjad and Matthew Wickert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
