Cases 81 - 90 of 49,254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Banerjee v. WallacePetty et al
as 1:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Monidipa Banerjee
Defendant:
Amanda Dale WallacePetty, A. Buenaventura, Fairfax County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rosario v. Legal Aid Justice Center
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Diane Cristina Rosario
Defendant:
Legal Aid Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Anthony Gardner, Jr. v. Kenyatta Momon
as 24-1424
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LAMONT GARDNER, JR.
Defendant:
KENYATTA MOMON, in his individual and official capacity as a member of the Fairfax County Police Department, THOMAS ARMEL, in his individual and official capacity as a member of the Fairfax County Police Department and COUNTY OF FAIRFAX
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00805
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Horne v. Monahan's Pub
as 1:2024cv01387
Plaintiff:
Gregory Horne
Defendant:
Monahan's Pub
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Goldsboro Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Darrell Hubbard
Defendant:
Goldsboro Police Department, Alvino Daniels, Eric Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
