Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1130
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1078
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
John and Jane Parents 1 v. Montgomery County Board of Education We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-2034
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN AND JANE PARENTS 1 and JOHN PARENT 2
Defendant / Appellee: MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, SHEBRA L. EVANS, individually and in their official capacity as Member of the Montgomery County Board of Education, BRENDA WOLFF, individually and in their official capacity as Member of the Montgomery County Board of Education and others
Amicus Curiae: PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE, DR. ERICA E. ANDERSON, JEWISH COALITION FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY and others
Bostick & Associates Business and Legal Consulting Group, LLC v. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, et al
as 1:2022cv02505
Defendant: Maryland, Grace Communion International, Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and others
Plaintiff: Bostick & Associates Business and Legal Consulting Group, LLC, Christina J. Bostick, C.B.T. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Civil Damages for Interception Wire or Oral Communications
National Fair Housing Alliance et al v. Bank of America, National Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01919
Plaintiff: H.O.P.E. Inc. d/b/a Hope Fair Housing Center, Fair Housing Center of Northern Alabama, Fair Housing Advocates of Northern California and others
Defendant: Bank of America Corp., Safeguard Properties Management, LLC and Bank of America, National Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Intl Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-1351
Plaintiff / Appellee: INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, MUHAMMED METEAB and others
Defendant / Appellant: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv03102
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1982
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00034
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Commonwealth of Virginia v. James Reinhard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1845
Plaintiff - Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Virgnia Office for Protection and Advocacy
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES REINHARD, in his official capacity as Commissioner, Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services of the Commonwealth of Virginia, DENISE D. MICHELETTI, in her official capacity as Director, Central Virginia Training Center and CHARLES M. DAVIS, in his official capacity as Director, Central State Hospital
Potential Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL DISABILITY RIGHTS NETWORK and SIX STATE PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY SYSTEMS, Constituted as Independent State Agencies
Amicus Supporting Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Supporting Appellee: ALABAMA DISABILITIES ADVOCACY PROGRAM, KENTUCKY PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY, MARYLAND DISABILITY LAW CENTER and others
Phophet James Oliver v. ACLU
as 08-1136
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES R. OLIVER
Defendant - Appellee: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, DONNA LIEBERMAN, DENNIS CIOLLI and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?