Cases 1 - 10 of 163
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Boyd v. Municipality of Robersonville et al
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
S. Boyd
Defendant:
Municipality of Robersonville, Leon Bonner, Cynthia Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Taras Raggio v. Chris Davis
as 24-1214
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO, PHD
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, Pamlico County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, Craven County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT, Cumberland County Sheriffs Office and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Botten v. Charleston County EMS et al
as 2:2023cv05064
Plaintiff:
Randy Botten
Defendant:
Charleston County EMS and Christopher Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vanderhorst et al v. City of Georgetown et al
as 2:2023cv03594
Plaintiff:
Tony Vanderhorst, Evelyn McCray and Willie Singleton
Defendant:
City of Georgetown, Robert Durant Cox, Ryan J. Call and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
