Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Nia Lucas v. VHC Health
as 24-1128
Plaintiff:
NIA LUCAS and A.M., II, a minor, by and though his Guardian ad Litem, Nia Lucas
Defendant:
VHC HEALTH, d/b/a Virginia Hospital Center and VHC PHYSICIAN GROUP, LLC, d/b/a VHC Health Physician/OBGYN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Felicia Morgan v. City of Charlotte
as 23-1748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELICIA MORGAN, individually and as Guardian ad Litem of other Bobby Morgan
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHARLOTTE, EDWARD GONZALEZ, both individually and in his official capacity as a law enforcement officer with CMPD, DEREK RUD, both individually and in his official capacity as a law enforcement officer with CMPD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gordon v. Croutch et al
as 1:2020cv00801
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ryan Gordon
Defendant:
CPS Agent Allison Kelly, Guardian ad litem and Cabinet Secretary Bill Croutch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
WADE v. ALAMANCE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2019cv00619
Plaintiff:
MARISHA N. WADE
Defendant:
ALAMANCE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM ALAMANCE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
