Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
John Dickson, Jr. v. Former FBI Director
as 18-1299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA ROBINSON, In her individual capacity as a person, acting under Color of State Law, FORMER FBI DIRECTOR JAMES BRIEN COMEY, JR., In his individual capacity, as a person acting under Color of federal and State Law, FBI AGENT MRS./MS. KATHERINE ANDREWS, Former Special Agent in Charge of the Newport News Field office, In her individual capacity, as a person acting under Color of federal and State Law and others
Mark Duncan v. Shirley McKinney
as 18-1090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK J. DUNCAN and IRIS S. DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SHIRLEY GIBSON MCKINNEY, ROBERT MCKINNEY, SARAH HUDSON and others
Dickson v. Former FBI Director James B. Comey Jr. et al
as 4:2018cv00002
Defendant:
Northampton Community Center, Ms. Lisa Taylor, John/Jane Doe (s) Employees and others
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
DUNCAN et al v. MCKINNEY et al
as 1:2017cv01026
Plaintiff:
MARK J. DUNCAN and IRIS S. DUNCAN
Defendant:
SHIRLEY GIBSON MCKINNEY, ROBERT MCKINNEY, SARAH HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00263
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Walmart Corporation
as 3:2007cv03044
Plaintiff:
Clyde Williams
Defendant:
Walmart Corporation and Walmart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
