Cases 1 - 10 of 503
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (National Origin)
Hodges v. Henrico County Risk Management et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Hodges
Defendant:
Henrico County Risk Management and Bradley Randall Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Benites Sosa v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Wilber Jose Benites Sosa
Defendant:
Glendell Hill, Prince William-Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center, Pete Meletis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melvin Gibbs v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 24-1262
Appellant:
M. EUGENE GIBBS and MELVIN EUGENE GIBBS
Defendant:
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Plaintiff:
KRISTOFFER HICKS, LAQUITA OLIVER, CHERELLE JACOB and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hodges v. Henrico County
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Michael Prince Hodges
Defendant:
Henrico County, Margaret Deglau, Shannon Flinchum Meadowcroft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
