Cases 11 - 20 of 192
Smith v. Miller et al
as 3:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Harry W. Smith
Defendant:
Warden Miller, Assistant Warden Oates, Captain Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, CATRINA AMELIA THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeriton Curry v. US
as 23-6128
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERITON LAVAR CURRY
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Curry v. USA
as 3:2023cv00032
Petitioner:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Turner v. Curry et al
as 2:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
Covey Turner
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Curry, Correctional Officer Doe and West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kareem Leaphart v. Douglas Curry
as 22-7166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREEM ADULE JABBAR LEAPHART
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS CURRY
Defendant:
ROBERT MCINTYRE, JAMES GLEATON, JOHN MOORE and others
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Sarah Weiss
as 22-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, JOHN MEADORS, BARNEY GIESE, all three individually for damages arising from malicious prosecution and for qui tam recovery and others
SIMERSON v. TODD et al
as 1:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
TERRY SIMERSON
Defendant:
JONATHAN TODD, SIMMONS, CURRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeriton Curry v. J. Olberding
as 22-6497
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERITON LAVAR CURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
J. OLBERDING, SIS Officer and OFFICER HARDISON, SHU Staff
Curry v. USA
as 3:2022cv00180
Petitioner:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
