Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Wolfe v. Rynolds et al
as 4:2018cv01350
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Wolfe
Defendant:
Nfn Rynolds, Nfn Sharp, Nfn Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Asbell et al
as 5:2018ct03111
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Defendant:
Thomas E. Asbell, II, Captain Johnson, Sgt. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Hooks
as 5:2018ct03076
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Defendant:
Erik A. Hooks, Kenneth E. Lassiter, Thomas E. Asbell, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman Wilkerson v. County of Chesterfield
as 16-6269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN KEVIN WILKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, CHESTERFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Kline v. Nevling
as 2:2016cv00027
Petitioner:
James J. Kline, II
Respondent:
Jerome M. Nevling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilkerson v. County of Chesterfield et al
as 2:2015cv00531
Plaintiff:
Norman Kevin Wilkerson
Defendant:
County of Chesterfield, Chesterfield Police Department, Chesterfield County Commonwealth Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman Wilkerson v. Shannon Taylor
as 14-7012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN KEVIN WILKERSON, the Atty-in-Fact on behalf of inmate Norman Kevin Wilkerson
Defendant - Appellee:
SHANNON TAYLOR, WILLIAM WALLACE DAVENPORT, THOMAS MATTHEW MCKENNA and others
Wilkerson v. Taylor et al
as 2:2014cv00294
Plaintiff:
Norman Kevin Wilkerson
Defendant:
Shannon Taylor, William Davenport, Thomas McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEPHENS v. KLINE et al
as 1:2012cv00161
Petitioner:
TRAVIS OTIS STEPHENS
Defendant:
TRACY KLINE, MARK MCCULLOUGH, LARRY E. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEPHENS v. KLINE et al
as 1:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS O. STEPHENS
Defendant:
TRACY KLINE and MARK MCCULLOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
