Cases 11 - 20 of 1,454
Aurel v. Jessup Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2024cv01352
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Jessup Correctional Institution, Dr. Khalid El-Bedavei, MD, Dr. Muleta Obsu, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Rosch et al
as 7:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Keith Almarode, Melissa Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kasyjanski v. Allyene et al
as 1:2024cv02278
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Kasyjanski
Defendant:
Jennifer Allyene, Kelly Lotnard, Nicole Chimenti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Miller v. Duffy et al
as 6:2024cv02268
Plaintiff:
Chavis T Miller
Defendant:
Lt Susan Duffy, Magon Toth, E Cowley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
David Atkins, Jr. v. Doctor Shamar
as 24-6352
Plaintiff:
DAVID ATKINS, JR.
Defendant:
DOCTOR SHAMAR, Facility Doctor, NURSE STITH, RN, MS. OSEGHALE, Food Service Supervisor and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN MILLER
Morrison v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Ethan Morrison
Defendant:
Corporal Waylen Miller and Corporal N. Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Haqq v. Mims et al
as 2:2024cv01899
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Mr Mims, Ms. Butler, Staci Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. McCoy et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Karsten Allen
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, Major Cain, Unit Manager Earnshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. USA
as 5:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Brent Cecil Miller
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
