Cases 11 - 20 of 374
Gregory v. Cherokee County Detention Center et al
as 4:2023cv07099
Plaintiff:
Jamarcus Terrell Gregory
Defendant:
Cherokee County Detention Center and Kirkland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Gladden v. Sgt. P. Sojka et al
as 0:2023cv06925
Plaintiff:
Obryant Terrelle Gladden and O.B.
Defendant:
Sgt. P. Sojka, Ofc. Tolbert and Municipality of Lancaster County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Terrell v. Lovette
as 5:2023cv00369
Petitioner:
Brooks Terrell
Respondent:
Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ailes v. Scott et al
as 4:2023cv06217
Plaintiff:
Justin Ailes
Defendant:
Cheveron Terrell Scott and Bradley M. Tarte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bethea v. City of North Myrtle Beach Police Department
as 4:2023cv06238
Plaintiff:
Leon Terrell Bethea
Defendant:
City of North Myrtle Beach Police Department and Steven M. Ostin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Howard v. McFadden
as 3:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
Terrell T. Howard
Defendant:
Garry McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. Queen et al
as 4:2023cv05959
Plaintiff:
Terrell Grant
Defendant:
Horry County Beach Patrol Officer Queen and Jard P Soury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Terrell v. Lovett
as 3:2023cv00235
Petitioner:
Brooks Terrell
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sivells v. USA - 2255
as 1:2023cv03112
Petitioner:
Terrell Sivells
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Doni Anderson v. Kenneth Nelson
as 23-6979
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONI TERRELE ANDERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
MR. KENNETH NELSON, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
