Cases 21 - 30 of 1,243
Alford v. W. Glenn Campbell Detention Center et al
as 9:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
Lashawn Alexander Alford
Defendant:
W. Glenn Campbell Detention Center, Allison Days and Lionel Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christopher Lumpkin v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6142
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DEWAYNE LUMPKIN
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir., Virginia Department of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Dir., Virginia Department of Corrections, VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
MARTIN v. BIRKHEAD et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
BRANDON OTHA MARTIN
Defendant:
CHARLES F. BIRKHEAD, MRS. SPENCER, MRS. HOLLOWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muqit v. ofc Rivera et al
as 0:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Yahya Muqit
Defendant:
ofc Rivera, Sgt Salazor, Sgt. Kimbrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Martin v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
John Robert Martin, Jr.
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Martin v. Jeffrey Nines
as 24-6093
Petitioner:
CHARLES BRANDON MARTIN
Respondent:
JEFFREY NINES, Acting Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Martin v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
John Robert Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Martin v. Jeffrey Nines
as 24-6086
Petitioner:
CHARLES BRANDON MARTIN
Respondent:
JEFFREY NINES, Acting Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Martin v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Randall Cedis Martin
Respondent:
H. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MARTIN v. UNKNOWN OFFICIALS at the DURHAM COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
BRANDON O. MARTIN and BRANDON OTHA MARTIN
Defendant:
DURHAM COUNTY JAIL and UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT DURHAM COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
