Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Chatman v. Unknown
as 7:2012cv00091
Petitioner:
Kenneth Tyron Chatman
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chatman v. Unknown
as 1:2012cv00176
Petitioner:
Kenneth Tyron Chatman
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Davis v. US
as 10-6865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL PROFIT DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHATMAN, in her individual and official capacity as Physician's Assistant, DEE, in her individual and official capacity as Physician's Assistant and others
Rashad Chatman v. Director, Virginia Dept. Corr.
as 10-6645
Petitioner - Appellant:
RASHAD MONTRELL CHATMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Murray v. Keller et al
as 5:2010ct03038
Plaintiff:
Adrian D. Murray
Defendant:
Alvin Keller, Unknown Exec. Director of N.C.P.L.S., Dekhasta Rozier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Director, Dept. of Corr.
as 2:2009cv00465
Petitioner:
Rashad Montrell Chatman
Respondent:
Director, Dept. of Corr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chatman v. McMaster et al
as 4:2009cv02234
Petitioner:
Dawan Chatman
Respondent:
Henry McMaster and Michael McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chatman v. Wake County Jail
as 5:2008ct03134
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Chatman
Defendant:
Wake County Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2008ct03130
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Davis
Defendant:
United States Of America, Chatman, Dee and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
REEVES v. HUBBARD et al
as 1:2008cv00635
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM B. REEVES
Defendant:
FREDERICK HUBBARD, ALBERT THOMAS, BRAD PERRITT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
