Cases 21 - 30 of 123
Melby v. Morgan et al
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Dajade Elijah Melby
Defendant:
Sheriff Gabe Morgan, Sr., Sgt. T. Walker, Sgt. G. Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orlando Monroe v. Herman Massenburg
as 22-6286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORLANDO O. MONROE
Defendant / Appellee:
HERMAN MASSENBURG, Correctional Officer and CHARLES ARMSTRONG, Major
Defendant:
RIVERSIDE REGIONAL JAIL and LARRY LEABOUGH, Superintendent
Taylor v. Luz et al
as 0:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leon Taylor
Defendant:
Ofc. Debra Luz, Major J. Smith, K. Burnham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
White v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00656
Plaintiff:
Terry Antonio White
Defendant:
United States of America, Mrs. Walters, P.A. Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goss v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2021cv00900
Defendant:
Julie J Armstrong and Alan Wilson
Plaintiff:
Darrell L Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MacKey v. Maruka et al
as 1:2021cv00092
Defendant:
Saunders, Oxford, C. Maruka and others
Plaintiff:
Evaristus MacKey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goggins v. Laurens County Detention Center et al
as 5:2021cv00186
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Miller, Laurens County Detention Center and Correctional Officer Armstrong
Plaintiff:
Robert Lamonte Goggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coward v. Clarke et al
as 7:2020cv00702
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Donnell Coward and Kelvin D. Coward
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, D. Dameron, S. Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Leabeau et al
as 3:2020cv00685
Defendant:
H. Reid, Leabeau, Poarch and others
Plaintiff:
James Lamont Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Superintendent Desadier et al
as 1:2020cv00682
Plaintiff:
Leroy Jones
Defendant:
Ms Bryant, H Reed, Major L Armstrong #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
