Cases 21 - 30 of 5,749
David Little, Jr. v. John Palmer
as 24-6516
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTONIO LITTLE, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN PALMER, Warden, BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director, T. ROBERTSON, Assistant Warden and others
Orr v. Cothron et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Eric Christopher Orr
Defendant:
David Cothron, Derek Price, Kevin Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02100
Petitioner:
Ruben Fuller
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Balfour v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Craig Balfour
Defendant:
David Miller and U.S. Customs and Border Patrol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stitely v. Yes Care
as 1:2024cv01512
Plaintiff:
David Stitely
Defendant:
Yes Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruey v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail - Tazewell
as 7:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
David Lee Cruey, II
Defendant:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail - Tazewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Franklin et al
as 5:2024ct03128
Plaintiff:
David Henderson
Defendant:
Allison Franklin, Bryan Nelson, N. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lt. Chandler et al
as 0:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
David Tyran Johnson
Defendant:
Lt. Chandler, Sgt. Calex, SCDC Security Threat Group Intelligence Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Paige v. Marshall et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
Brianna Nicole Paige, Brianna Ann Sunshine and William Allen LaRue
Respondent:
William Marshall, Shelby O. Searls, Sherry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David James, Jr. v. Roanoke City Sheriff's Office
as 24-6479
Plaintiff:
DAVID RANDALL JAMES, JR.
Defendant:
ROANOKE CITY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
