Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Saunders v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv10159
Plaintiff:
Edward Harold Saunders, Jr.
Defendant:
B.J. Johnson, Jane Doe Richer, D. LeMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Diamond et al
as 1:2016cv03323
Plaintiff:
Chauncy Pierre Johnson
Defendant:
Diamond, Michael Higgins and Lt. Lippette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Music et al
as 3:2016cv08301
Plaintiff:
Steven James Little
Defendant:
Eric Music , Western Regional Jail, Prime Care Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laquan Simmons v. Cumberland County Municipality
as 16-7123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAQUAN LORENZO SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY MUNICIPALITY, KELLY DIAMOND, SARAH THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
US v. Daniel Bifield
as 16-6024
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL EUGENE BIFIELD, a/k/a Diamond Dan
Thompson v. Diamond
as 3:2015cv00604
Plaintiff:
William L. Thompson
Defendant:
FNU Diamond
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Cumberland County Municipality et al
as 5:2015ct03317
Plaintiff:
Laquan Lorenzo Simmons
Defendant:
Cumberland County Municipality, Kelly Diamond, Sarah Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casteele et al v. West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority et al
as 3:2015cv13842
Plaintiff:
Matthew Clyde Casteele and John Mack Smith
Defendant:
West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority, More, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steele v. Robinson et al
as 3:2015cv00252
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gerald Steele
Defendant:
FNU Robinson, FNU Diamond and FNU Henderson
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis Shuler v. D. Mitchell
as 15-6842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS D. SHULER
Defendant - Appellee:
D. MITCHELL, R. HARRIS and L. DIAMOND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
