Cases 21 - 30 of 74
Parham v. Kay
as 8:2017cv01039
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Clark Parham
Defendant:
Robert Christian Kay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terell Moore v. Valerie Parham
as 17-6531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERELL MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
VALERIE PARHAM, Laundry Supervisor, DIANE DALE, Counselor, T. BARRETT, Registered Nurse and others
Defendant:
R. CLAYTON, Registered Nurse and O. JONES, Correctional Officer
Parham v. Young
as 5:2017cv02016
Petitioner:
Marcus Dwayne Parham
Respondent:
David L. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Saunders v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail et al
as 3:2016cv00947
Plaintiff:
Darrius Ferrell Saunders
Defendant:
Western Tidewater Regional Jail, Lt. Parker, Lt. Dupri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Jones v. Dr. Butler
as 16-6939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK JACOB JONES, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. BUTLER, M. D. and DR. GRAHAM, M. D.
Defendant:
WESTERN TIDEWATER REGIONAL JAIL, MEDICAL STAFF, FOOD KITCHEN STAFF and others
Saunders v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00409
Plaintiff:
George William Saunders
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Suffolk Sheriff Dept., Western Tidewater Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry v. Smith et al
as 2:2016cv00056
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Harry
Defendant:
William Smith, Lt. Col. Parham and Nurse A. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkley v. Smith et al
as 2:2015cv00403
Plaintiff:
Sean Antonio Brinkley
Defendant:
William C. Smith , Antonio Parham , Cleveland Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail et al
as 2:2015cv00316
Plaintiff:
Mark Jacob Jones
Defendant:
Western Tidewater Regional Jail, Medical Staff, Food Kitchen Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parham v. Lightsey et al
as 5:2015ct03098
Plaintiff:
Robert Parham
Defendant:
Joseph Lightsey, Thomas Nuzum, Pamala Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
