Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Shepherd v. Clay
as 5:2016hc02221
Petitioner:
Maurice Shepherd
Respondent:
Harvey Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shepherd v. Ballard
as 2:2016cv06669
Plaintiff:
Morgan Shepherd
Defendant:
David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curtis Richardson v. Matt Mahon
as 16-6303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS RICHARDSON, a/k/a Curtis D. Richardson, a/k/a Curtis Dale Richardson
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT MAHON, Loris SC Policeman, individual and official capacity, KAREN SHEPHERD, Chief of Police of Loris, SC, individual and official capacity, SGT RICHARDSON, individual and official capacity and others
Shepherd v. USA
as 1:2016cv00186
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Laura Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi v. Terry McAuliffe
as 15-7748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADIB EDDIE RAMEZ MAKDESSI
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY MCAULIFFE, Virginia Governor, HARVEY BRYANT, Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach, KATHERINE ELIZABETH ORSINI, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach and others
Richardson v. Mahon et al
as 4:2015cv03317
Plaintiff:
Curtis Richardson
Defendant:
Matt Mahon, Karen Shepherd, Sgt Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Makdessi v. McAuliffe et al
as 3:2014cv00214
Plaintiff:
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
Defendant:
Terry McAuliffe, Harvy Bryant, Katherine Orsini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shepherd v. Blocker et al
as 1:2013cv13757
Plaintiff:
Terrence Shepherd
Defendant:
William Goode, Carl Hill, Karen F. Hogsten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wingate v. Byrd et al
as 4:2013cv03343
Plaintiff:
Ernestine Wingate
Defendant:
Wayne Byrd , Darlington County Sheriff's Office , Darlington, The County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shepard v. USA
as 1:2012cv80475
Petitioner:
Timothy Shepherd
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
