Cases 21 - 30 of 86
Thorne v. The United States Of America et al
as 3:2018cv00109
Defendant:
Registered Nurse Friend, Warden Coakley, A.W. Keys and others
Plaintiff:
Tashawn Qwantreal Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thorne v. USA
as 5:2018cv00327
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tashawn Qwantreal Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thorne v. USA
as 5:2018cv00328
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tashawn Qwantreal Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
TYLER v. POOLE et al
as 1:2017cv01142
Plaintiff:
CASEY RAFEAL TYLER
Defendant:
KATY POOLE, WILLIAM BULLARD, RONALD COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tashawn Thorne v. Officer Wesley
as 17-7039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TASHAWN QWANTREAL THORNE
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER WESLEY, Piedmont Correctional Officer, OFFICER SHERWIN, Piedmont Regional Jail, OFFICER BOOKER, Piedmont Regional Jail Officer and others
Defendant:
MS. BOWEN, Mental Health, MS. L. SMITH, Medical Nurse, MRS. SERGEANT TISDALE, Grievance Coordinator and others
US v. Antowan Thorne
as 17-6748
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTOWAN THORNE, a/k/a Smooth
Thorne v. West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority et al
as 2:2017cv03070
Plaintiff:
Dustin Thorne
Defendant:
West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority , Channel, Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorne v. USA
as 3:2017cv00234
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeronza Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
THORNE-BEY v. PASQUOTANK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 1:2016cv01061
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. THORNE-BEY
Defendant:
PASQUOTANK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorne v. Sherwin et al
as 1:2016cv00967
Plaintiff:
Tashawn Qwantreal Thorne
Defendant:
Officer Sherwin, Officer Wesley, Officer Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
