Cases 31 - 40 of 11,788
Stokes v. Bateman
as 7:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Monte M. Stokes
Defendant:
Assistant Warden J. Bateman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Witherspoon v. Warden, Ronald S. Weber
as 1:2024cv01551
Petitioner:
Edward Witherspoon
Respondent:
Warden, Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker Washington, Jr. v. Warden Kelly
as 24-6514
Plaintiff:
WALKER WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN KELLY, Individual Capacity, CAPTAIN CHASE, Individual Capacity, LIEUTENANT ALLEN, (S.E.S.) (S.I.S.), Individual Capacity and others
Douglas v. Stewart
as 1:2024cv01544
Petitioner:
Dwayne Douglas
Respondent:
Warden Timothy Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fuller v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02100
Petitioner:
Ruben Fuller
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Horton v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00263
Petitioner:
Mandrell Horton
Respondent:
Warden W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Day v. Rich et al
as 5:2024ct03135
Plaintiff:
Roger Charles Day, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Rich, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Vaughan v. Arnold et al
as 1:2024cv01542
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Vaughan
Defendant:
Warden Keith Arnold, Asst Warden Bethany Cornchia, Chief of Security Ronald Stotler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Derrick A. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fooks, Jr v. Warden of Patuxent et al
as 1:2024cv01511
Plaintiff:
Anton Fooks, Jr
Defendant:
Warden of Patuxent and Corizen Medical Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
