Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Sundari Prasad v. Vivienne Cheek
as 17-7083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUNDARI K. PRASAD
Defendant - Appellee:
VIVIENNE B. CHEEK, VIVIAN B. CHEEK, CAROLYN D. NELSON and others
Ruach El et al v. Chang et al
as 2:2017cv01915
Plaintiff:
Qadim Ruach El, Ameenah Adilah El, S.A EL and others
Defendant:
Susan Chang, Charleston County Department of Social Services, Ajoni Holmes Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Rogers et al
as 8:2017cv00348
Plaintiff:
Tutankhamun Holt
Defendant:
Michael J. Rogers, Amy Kay Brizenoine, Baker & Tisdale, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick of the family of Morgan v. Hughes et al
as 1:2017cv01208
Petitioner:
Patrick of the family of Morgan
Respondent:
Lynn N. Hughes, Kenneth Magidson, Jennifer Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodger II of the family of Atwood v. Connor et al
as 2:2017cv01180
Petitioner:
Rodger II of the family of Atwood
Respondent:
Christopher C. Connor, Christy H. Fawcett, James T. Clancy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prasad v. Cheek et al
as 3:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
Viviene B. Cheek, Vivian B. Cheek, Carolyn D. Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sundari K. Prasad v. Monica Vick
as 16-7725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUNDARI K. PRASAD
Defendant - Appellee:
MONICA K. VICK, Drug Addict, HAMILTON L. HENDRIX, GLORIA DALE LEWIS-SORRELL and others
Atwood v. Atwood et al
as 1:2016cv10162
Petitioner:
Rodger II of the family of Atwood
Respondent:
Rodger Theodore Atwood, II and B. Rickard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Adams v. Sanders et al
as 6:2016cv03448
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Neal Adams
Defendant:
Ben Sander, Drew Walensky and Family Dollar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Muhammad v. Correct Care Solution
as 16-6457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MUHAMMAD, Ahmad Muhammad-Ali
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH and CLIENT ISAIAH HEMPHILL, and Family
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
