Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Watts v. GEO Group et al
as 8:2015cv03847
Plaintiff:
William T Watts, II
Defendant:
GEO Group, Just Care and GEO Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Waters et al
as 2:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Waters
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Incorporated, Ed Wright, Daniel Calhoun, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Thompson, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 15-6817
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC, DAVID B. EVERETT, Regional Operations Chief, VDOC Eastern Region, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Rashid Kirkland v. Mr. Thoma
as 15-6531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RASHID GARY KIRKLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. THOMAS and THE GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED
Dorsey v. The Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00669
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Dorsey, Jr.
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Inc., Hagerstown Correctional Facility, Montgomery County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Brinkema et al
as 5:2015ct03012
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Banks
Defendant:
Lenie M. Brinkema, Paul J. McNulty, Patrick Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daughtry v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2014ct03303
Plaintiff:
Theodore Daughtry
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Brick Tripp, David Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abdeljalil v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2014ct03280
Plaintiff:
Muawia Abdeljalil
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Chaplain Williams, Brick Tripp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doren v. The GEO Group et al
as 5:2014ct03266
Plaintiff:
Donald Duren
Defendant:
The GEO Group and North Carolina Prison Permit Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malede v. GEO Group, Inc et al
as 5:2014ct03236
Plaintiff:
Negash Malede
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc, Brick Tripp, Donna Mellendick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
