Cases 31 - 40 of 40
US v. Peter Jordan
as 12-7020
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PETER ROBERT JORDAN, a/k/a Pete, a/k/a Richard Mercer
Mercer v. Ballard
as 2:2012cv00040
Petitioner:
Edward J. Mercer
Respondent:
Warden David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowie v. Mercer et al
as 5:2012ct03091
Plaintiff:
David A. Bowie
Defendant:
Sgt. Mercer, Officer Russell, Officer Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00994
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Kanode v. Boggess et al
as 1:2010cv00407
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Kanode, Sr.
Defendant:
Timothy D. Boggess, Southern Regional Drug and Violent Crime Task Force, State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00061
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00060
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kanode v. Swope, et al
as 1:2009cv01530
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Kanode, Sr.
Defendant:
Derek C. Swope, Scott Ash, Mike L. Gills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. State of WV
as 07-7354
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS GALE HUBBARD
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, MERCER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, BLUEFIELD, WEST VIRGINIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Hubbard v. State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2006cv00610
Petitioner:
Dennis Gale Hubbard
Respondent:
State of West Virginia, Mercer County Sheriff's Dept., Mercer County Sheriff's Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
