Cases 31 - 40 of 2,092
Christopher Lumpkin v. VDOC Director Dotson
as 24-6275
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DEWAYNE LUMPKIN
Defendant:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR CHADWICK DOTSON, SUSSEX I STATE PRISON MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, MS. CARTER, Head of All Medical Departments of Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Umar Adeyola v. Edavally Reddy
as 24-1244
Plaintiff:
UMAR ADEYOLA
Defendant:
DR. EDAVALLY REDDY, JENNIFER ADKINS, MS. BUNN and others
SMALLWOOD v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
LAMARQUIS SMALLWOOD
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. SAMPSON, TAMARA RUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodson v. Summers et al
as 7:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr.
Defendant:
L. Summers, Ms. P. Adams, Ms. Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., OFFICER SLONG, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smallwood v. Locklear et al
as 5:2024ct03064
Plaintiff:
Lamarquis Smallwood
Defendant:
Dean Locklear, Ms. Sampson, Tamara Rush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Aramark workers et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Quantel Omek Saunders
Defendant:
Aramark workers, Aramark supervisors, Capt. Hinchman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dews v. DPSCS et al
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dews
Defendant:
DPSCS, Warden Greene and FA - MS Goodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dews v. Greene et al
as 1:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dews
Defendant:
Warden Greene and Ms. Goodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Antonio Wilson
Defendant:
D. Watson, K. Knolls, Ms. Gomes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
