Cases 41 - 50 of 276
Almendarez v. United States et al
as 5:2022hc02130
Petitioner:
Jesse Almendarez
Respondent:
United States, Robert J. Dodson and Robert J. Higdon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davison v. USA-2255
as 1:2022cv01443
Petitioner:
Jesse Aaron Davison
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Riddick v. Phillips et al
as 7:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
B. Phillips, L. Jesse and Dr. Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mickles v. Heckard
as 5:2022cv00242
Petitioner:
Jesse Mickles
Respondent:
Warden Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Copen v. Lanham
as 5:2022cv00135
Petitioner:
Jesse James Copen
Respondent:
Brian/Kelly Lanham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Copen SR. v. Harper et al
as 5:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Copen SR.
Defendant:
Tracy Harper, State Police Corpral Miller, Trooper Stalling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eddricco Brown-Bey v. North Carolina Dept. of Adult Corrections
as 22-6590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDDRICCO LI'SHAUN BROWN-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, GASTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, DAVID M. FRANCESCHELLI, Gaston County Prosecutor, in his individual and official capacity and others
Copen SR v. Daniels et al
as 5:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Copen SR
Defendant:
Pam Daniels, Erin Lynn, Misty Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Smith et al
as 5:2022ct03160
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Thomas
Defendant:
Mr. Smith, Mr. Aurther and Sgt. Shirley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copen v. Lanham
as 3:2022cv00078
Petitioner:
Jesse James Copen
Respondent:
Kelly Lanham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
