Cases 51 - 58 of 58
White v. Greenwood et al
as 5:2009ct03123
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis White
Defendant:
B.D. Greenwood and Chief of Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. City of N.N. Virginia et al
as 2:2009cv00269
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Brooks
Defendant:
City of N.N. Virginia, N.N. Va. Police Dept., Chief of Police (Det.) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hamlet v. State of W.V. Attorney General et al
as 1:2008cv01194
Plaintiff:
Brian Leon Hamlet
Defendant:
State of W.V. Attorney General, Det. T. A. Bailey, Chief, Princeton Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adrian McFadden v. Linda Davis
as 08-8009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN LEMONT MCFADDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA G. DAVIS, Chief of Police, C. Y. SINGLETARY, Police Officer, DAVID MICHAEL WOODWARD, Enforcement Agent and others
Jonathan Riches
as 08-7783
Appellant:
In re: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Plaintiff:
DAVID DARRYLL COONER
Defendant - None:
R. STEVEN BIGGS, in his official capacity as Town Manager for the Town of Clayton, ROBERT W. BRIDGES, in his official capacity as Acting Chief of Police for the Clayton Police Department and TOWN OF CLAYTON, a municipal corporation of the State of North Carolina
Barone v. Vincent et al
as 1:2008cv01353
Plaintiff:
David William Barone
Defendant:
Sampson G. Vincent, Davis R. Ruark, Salisbury City Policy Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TOURSCHER v. CASSTEVENS et al
as 1:2007cv00663
Plaintiff:
MARK TOURSCHER
Defendant:
LEON CASSTEVENS, KIM CLARK PHILLIPS, ALLEN SNEED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2007cv00403
Plaintiff:
David S. Johnson
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr., Robert M. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
