Cases 51 - 60 of 654
Newman v. Dill
as 1:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
Derrick Newman
Defendant:
J.J. Dill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Warden Tonya James
as 8:2023cv00982
Petitioner:
Derrick McDonald
Respondent:
Warden Tonya James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Letterlough v. Clark et al
as 5:2023ct03042
Plaintiff:
Derrick Derrail Letterlough
Defendant:
Demetrius A. Clark, Ja'Maar Watson and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hester v. Flowers
as 5:2023hc02030
Petitioner:
Derrick Hester
Respondent:
Warden Flowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CANO v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2022cv04247
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P. Stirling, DR. Chris Kunkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
PETTIFORD v. GORDON et al
as 1:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
DERRICK U. PETTIFORD
Defendant:
JAMES G. GORDON, MASON J. HESTER, AUSTIN B. PENDRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton v. Groh et al
as 5:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Clinton
Defendant:
Gina M. Groh, Robert W. Trumble, Anna Krasinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick Brunson v. Belinda Timmons
as 22-6961
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK D.L. BRUNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
BELINDA B. TIMMONS and ALVIN K. WORSLEY
Miller v. McFadden et al
as 3:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Roman Derrick Miller, Sr.
Defendant:
Gary L. McFadden, Mecklenburg Sheriff Department, County of Mecklenburg Government Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv02057
Plaintiff:
Derrick Brown
Defendant:
Gail Watts, Yolanda Rawlerson, Robert Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
