Cases 51 - 60 of 368
Willey v. Corizon Health, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01294
Plaintiff:
Neal F Willey, III
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dai'Shawn Neal v. Sgt. Golen
as 22-6532
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAI'SHAWN NEAL
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. GOLEN, Sergeant
Dai'Shawn Neal v. Simpson (Woman Sgt)
as 22-6533
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAI'SHAWN NEAL
Defendant / Appellee:
SIMPSON (WOMAN SGT), Sergeant and COWTHRAN, Sergeant
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Harman
as 1:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Dai'Shawn M. Neal
Defendant:
Lt. Harman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Thomas et al
as 5:2022ct03132
Plaintiff:
Darius Watson
Defendant:
Charlie Thomas, Martin Wasielewski, Rebecca Brigman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roshune Carelock v. Jeff Johnson
as 22-1352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSHUNE LEMARR CARELOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF JOHNSON, LYNETTE PATTON, WILLIAM BARNES and others
Defendant:
TRACY BLACK, NATALIE GAMBLE, MR. CHARLES and others
Denard Neal v. J. Streeval
as 22-6220
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENARD DARNELL NEAL
Respondent / Appellee:
J. C. STREEVAL, Warden, U.S.P. Lee, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, District of Arizona-Phoenix, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Eastern District of California and others
Neal v. Sgt. Floyd
as 1:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Dai'Shawn M. Neal
Defendant:
Sgt. Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Neal v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022ct03042
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neal
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Dennis Daniels, Antonia Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
