Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 134,412
JOHNSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00401
Petitioner: RUSSELL EDWARD JOHNSON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Neuhoff v. Bayless
as 5:2024cv00052
Petitioner: Colecius Neuhoff
Respondent: M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hodges v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00132
Petitioner: Gary Lee Hodges
Respondent: United States of America
Interested Party: John Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Glover v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 9:2024cv01388
Petitioner: Tekoa Glover
Respondent: Bureau of Prisons and Warden Sean Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
KERR v. USA
as 1:2024cv00263
Petitioner: NORMAN ALAN KERR
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Little v. McDaniel
as 0:2024cv03044
Plaintiff: David Antonio Little, Jr
Defendant: Eric McDaniel and Florence County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Jones v. Yescare Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv01365
Plaintiff: Brian Terrance Jones
Defendant: Yescare Corp., Jason Clem, Stephanie Cyran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Warden of WCI et al
as 1:2024cv01434
Plaintiff: Kyeem King
Defendant: Warden of WCI and Medical Provider for WCI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Quinn et al
as 5:2024cv00125
Defendant: FNU Starowicz, FNU Quinn, FNU Lay and others
Plaintiff: Robert Jeremy Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Middleton v. USA-2255
as 1:2024cv01438
Petitioner: Jamar Middleton
Respondent: USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?