Cases 61 - 70 of 188
Haynes v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv00528
Petitioner:
Mary Louise Haynes
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Timothy J. Lafon and John A. Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tucker v. Hazelrigg et al
as 5:2020ct03169
Defendant:
Nurse William, Jim O'Neill, Advocacy Worker and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2020cv00391
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant:
DOCTOR CUNNINGHAM, DOCTOR MARK HAZELRIGG, LT. WHITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oxendine v. Green et al
as 1:2020cv00805
Defendant:
H. Carr, J. Brooks, A. Schroyer and others
Plaintiff:
Nakayi Oxendine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Corporal v. Carr et al
as 8:2020cv00534
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Corporal
Defendant:
H. Carr, Commissioner Hill, Warden Weber and others
Interested Party:
The Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Mills v. MD Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 8:2020cv00432
Defendant:
Elkins, MD Division of Correction, Russell A. Neverdon and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Veney v. Brooks et al
as 8:2020cv00410
Defendant:
Officer H. Carr and Officer J. Brooks
Plaintiff:
DayQon Veney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Miller et al v. Waller et al
as 2:2019cv00907
Plaintiff:
Andrew Miller and Latasha Carr
Defendant:
Cpl. Waller and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 8:2019cv02803
Defendant:
C.O. A. Connell, C.O. Carr, C.O. D. Frenzel and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Jamal Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McBride v. A.C.D.F. et al
as 1:2019cv01156
Defendant:
Waters, Shanks, Odara and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin McBride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
