Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 365
Ford v. Lovette
as 3:2024cv00068
Petitioner: Dallas Ford
Respondent: Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hager et al v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00258
Plaintiff: Douglas Hager and Adam Lee Suratt
Defendant: Betsy Jividen, Michael Francis, Tiffany Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun-EL v. Kiabayan et al
as 1:2024cv01491
Plaintiff: James Calhoun-EL
Defendant: Hamid Kiabayan, Dr. Ford, Lum Maximuangu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Lovette
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner: Dallas Ford
Respondent: Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Boggs v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00151
Plaintiff: Dustin Boggs and Luke Tyler Holstein
Defendant: Betsy Jividen, Michael Francis, Tiffany Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Duptys
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff: DeQuan Ford
Defendant: Deputys and Sheriff Duptys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. USA
as 5:2024cv00060
Petitioner: Furman Alexander Ford
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Samuel Ford v. S. Lovett
as 23-7288
Petitioner: SAMUEL B. FORD
Respondent: STANLEY LOVETT, JR., Warden U.S.P. Hazelton
Ford v. Stone et al
as 5:2024ct03001
Plaintiff: Jarred J. Ford
Defendant: Keith Stone, Sheriff Bond Surety, Major Allen Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7070
Plaintiff / Appellant: LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Defendant / Appellee: CHADWICK DOTSON, VA D.O.C. Director, RANDALL C. MATHENA, VA D.O.C. Security Operations Manager, H. SCOTT RICHESON, Deputy Dir., VA D.O.C. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?