Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Sharp v. United States
as 1:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Robert Carl Sharp
Defendant:
Lt. C. Looney, Officer Specialist B. Jones, Correctional Officer Hatcher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Albert Anderson v. Winston Salem Police Department
as 23-6609
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, Sued in official capacity, BOBBY KIMBROUGH, Chief of sheriff sued in individual and official capacity, CATRINA THOMPSON, Chief of police sued in individual and official capacity and others
Williams v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Gilbert, Ofc. Gilbert, Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shreve v. Stephenson et al
as 5:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Shreve
Defendant:
B M Stephenson, B. Jones, Officer Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mcclure v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Matthew S. Mcclure
Defendant:
Pam Smith, Dr. Taylor, B. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Nesbitt v. Cumpagna et al
as 0:2020cv04193
Defendant:
Mr. M. Chartier, Sergeant Francis, Capt. Pendergrass and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baye v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020ct03044
Defendant:
H. Borges, B. Jones, Y. Lane and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Baye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maddox v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00872
Defendant:
Joe Fannon, S.L. Escoffery, A. David Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Deondray Daniel Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Warden
as 1:2019cv00212
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Edward B. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jennings v. Virgil et al
as 2:2019cv00077
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Jennings and Mustafa Beezy Bey
Defendant:
C. Virgil, B. Jones, J. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
